<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multicasting with ASR &#8211; A Brief Overview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.controlgroup.com/2009/05/26/multicasting-with-asr-a-brief-overview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.controlgroup.com/2009/05/26/multicasting-with-asr-a-brief-overview/</link>
	<description>Technology for Big Ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 01:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael West</title>
		<link>http://blog.controlgroup.com/2009/05/26/multicasting-with-asr-a-brief-overview/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.controlgroup.com/?p=220#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Comparing the two essentially is the old debate between apples and oranges.  A better comparison would be between ASR and MDT (Microsoft Deployment Toolkit.)  ImageX is a component of the MDT which is pretty much the same thing as ASR, essentially ASR = MDT / MDT = ASR.  Both are capable of multicast with the proper infrastructure in place, the images can be made to be customized with both, essentially they offer the same benefits.  I don&#039;t know the nitty gritty details about ASR but MDT does allow a great depth of customization on how the deployment can be done and what components, applications, and settings can be configured.  I assume that ASR can do the same or at least something comparable with little more effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparing the two essentially is the old debate between apples and oranges.  A better comparison would be between ASR and MDT (Microsoft Deployment Toolkit.)  ImageX is a component of the MDT which is pretty much the same thing as ASR, essentially ASR = MDT / MDT = ASR.  Both are capable of multicast with the proper infrastructure in place, the images can be made to be customized with both, essentially they offer the same benefits.  I don&#8217;t know the nitty gritty details about ASR but MDT does allow a great depth of customization on how the deployment can be done and what components, applications, and settings can be configured.  I assume that ASR can do the same or at least something comparable with little more effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OS3000</title>
		<link>http://blog.controlgroup.com/2009/05/26/multicasting-with-asr-a-brief-overview/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>OS3000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 20:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.controlgroup.com/?p=220#comment-26</guid>
		<description>How does an Apple roll out with ASR compare to a Windows roll out with ImageX roll out? I hope I&#039;m not opening up an APPL vs MSFT flame war..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does an Apple roll out with ASR compare to a Windows roll out with ImageX roll out? I hope I&#8217;m not opening up an APPL vs MSFT flame war..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

